Madam Supervisor and Town Board Members,
After receiving the Town’s work plan for a contamination Task Force from Councilman Hessney, I provided a copy to our core group and to those citizens who have asked to stay informed.
I asked that they read and comment on this so that we could provide the Town Board with some feedback.
With this, I have composed a list of comments from a number of citizens that responded to me directly. My comments are provided with in the text of the Town Board work plan outline (in blue). I would hope that others responded directly to the Town officials.
Citizen Comments:
Citizen 1: “We do not need a paid professional on the Task Force”
Citizen 2: “How do you achieve your agenda in a reasonable time frame?”
Citizen 3: “Who is going to organize all the issues expeditiously?”
Citizen 4: “Who will schedule the many details and who will coordinate the
progress?”
Citizen 5: “I think the 13 items might be less intimidating if they were grouped
into 5 or 6 categories: for instance:
(1) Establish a Town Task Force On the Above Issue (in the following
categories)
(2) Communications
Items # 2, 3, 10, 11
(3) Investigation & Legal
Item # 7
(4) Impact on Real Estate (including assessments and taxes)
Item # 4, 8, 9
(5) Funding
Item # 5
(6) Budget & Financing etc.”
Citizen 6: “I would erase "appropriately" from each of the items.
Citizen
7: “It is a start. We of
course will need time frames. And specifics
who...when....etc.”
Citizen 8: “I think there should be no more than 6-8 people on the task force.
This allows a more workable environment to achieve goals.”
Citizen 9: “A defined protocol which insures proper and correct information
being shared.”
The text of the Town Board Task Force work plan as delivered by Councilman Hessney is as follows: (my comments are in blue)
Proposed
Work Plan for Modock Springs Investigation (
This proposal was developed jointly by Paul Lytle (Environmental Scientist) and Rich Palumbo (Environmental Counsel) after receiving input from Victor citizens and the agencies/offices involved with the Modock Springs investigation (NYDEC, NYDOH, NYS Attorney General’s office and Senator Nozzolio’s office).
--Group reports routinely to the Town Board and includes citizens, Town
officials, and professional services.
mrb
comment:
Professional services should be a recommendation of the Task Force body and not
a part of the body.
--Once formed, the Task Force develops and delivers a work plan for approval by
the Town Board.
mrb
comment:
Are Task Force members to be selected via an appointment process or an open
application process?
mrb
comment:
I think that the work plan should be derived from a set of charges or
objectives as outlined in my comments below.
--Potential areas of work for consideration by the Task Force are included in the
following steps 2-13.
mrb comment: I don’t believe that the areas of work should be limited to any particular set of steps. Reference my comments below concerning general objectives.
mrb
comment:
I believe that there are three key elements associated with the structure of
the Task Force. These include:
1) There is a co-chair shared by 1 official and 1 citizen. The
remaining participants are made up of citizens directly contaminated, ones
living on the edge of the plume and some from the general community.
As I stated above, professional services people should be a recommendation of
the committee body.
2) A mission statement such as: (This has been recognized by the Town
Attorney as being reasonable.)
To investigate the contamination in our
community, the effects of the contamination from a health and economic
standpoint and to educate the community on our findings. Finally, to work with Town, County, State
and Federal officials and agencies to ensure that the community is well
represented.
3) A set of general objectives. I originally proposed the following:
I believe that these address all of the steps outlined by the work plan, and
the concerns and comments from the citizens. I believe that all of this
information should be combined into a single general set of charges/objectives.
As the Task Force completes its
work, there is likely to be some reasonable
broadening of any one charge, so we should not hold the Task Force to
a specific set of work areas.
Again, these charges have been
recognized as being reasonable by the Town Attorney.
mrb
comment:
Points 2 and 3 are both concerned with the following
general charge/objective:
mrb comment: This would be work associated with the following objectives/charges:
mrb
comment:
Home ventilation systems are already in place. What is needed in
continued monitoring and re-sampling of the homes identified by
the DEC as being so actionable.
mrb comment: This whole point is related to the following general charges:
mrb comment: Continued monitoring, re-sampling and public water hook ups are examples of recommendations that the Task Force body presents to the Town Board, DEC and any Federal representatives/agencies that may be involved.
mrb comment: Items 6 and 7 relate to the general charges of:
mrb comment : Point 8 should also include the investigation and evaluation of independent disease data collection options and outside environmental consultant candidates.
mrb comment:
Point 10
should not be limited to “local” and should also include established property
appraisal companies with experience in cases that involve environmental impact
studies.
mrb comment: Each of these points (8,9,10) are again examples of recommendations by the Task Force body based on the work associated with the above mission statement and objectives. They should not be listed as a specific area of work for the Task Force as it may actually limit the scope of the work needed to fully address the issue.
mrb comment: This point relates to the charge:
mrb comment: I’m not sure what this means, but it sounds important. This may represent another recommendation as it relates to the charge:
mrb
comment:
I suppose this relates to our request for a Capital Project Fund.
In the end, I feel that the more accurate the plan is from the
perspective of those who are immediately impacted and want to be involved and
informed, the more likely it is that any proposed vote
to create a Task Force will be accepted. I hope that the Town
Board will consider all of these comments when working on the
proposition/resolution for creating a contamination Task Force.
If anybody has any questions or concerns regarding this correspondence, please
don't hesitate to call me at any time today, Sunday or Monday.
Thank you for your time in reading this and considering it as input into your
decision to appoint a contamination Task Force.
Michael Barry
Victor Citizens Against Contamination
www.victornytce.org